Skip to Content
Main content

SCHALMONT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

186

32%

LEVEL 2

232

40%

LEVEL 3

140

24%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

160

28%

LEVEL 2

208

36%

LEVEL 3

169

29%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

71

26%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

96

35%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

115

37%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

162

31%

LEVEL 2

218

41%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

138

27%

LEVEL 2

186

37%

LEVEL 3

146

29%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

128

25%

LEVEL 2

224

44%

LEVEL 3

139

27%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

111

21%

LEVEL 2

201

39%

LEVEL 3

167

32%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

58

87%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

49

84%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

109

26%

LEVEL 2

179

42%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

82

19%

LEVEL 2

161

38%

LEVEL 3

143

34%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

77

49%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

78

50%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.