VAN ANTWERP MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

94

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

73

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

58

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

47

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

84

42%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

19

34%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

92

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

73

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

25

68%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

86

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

71

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.