Skip to Content
Main content

SCOTIA-GLENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,167

LEVEL 1

424

36%

LEVEL 2

442

38%

LEVEL 3

229

20%

LEVEL 4

72

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 800

LEVEL 1

248

31%

LEVEL 2

289

36%

LEVEL 3

197

25%

LEVEL 4

66

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

167

30%

LEVEL 2

218

39%

LEVEL 3

127

23%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

257

42%

LEVEL 2

224

37%

LEVEL 3

102

17%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

155

36%

LEVEL 2

164

38%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

283
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,079

LEVEL 1

389

36%

LEVEL 2

407

38%

LEVEL 3

214

20%

LEVEL 4

69

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

248
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

214

29%

LEVEL 2

265

36%

LEVEL 3

184

25%

LEVEL 4

64

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

21

53%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

23

64%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 938

LEVEL 1

239

25%

LEVEL 2

402

43%

LEVEL 3

225

24%

LEVEL 4

72

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

147

22%

LEVEL 2

269

40%

LEVEL 3

194

29%

LEVEL 4

65

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

185

81%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

101

81%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 864

LEVEL 1

274

32%

LEVEL 2

333

39%

LEVEL 3

196

23%

LEVEL 4

61

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

215
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

128

23%

LEVEL 2

218

39%

LEVEL 3

156

28%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

150

50%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

120

50%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.