Skip to Content
Main content

BALLSTON SPA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 906

LEVEL 1

268

30%

LEVEL 2

364

40%

LEVEL 3

196

22%

LEVEL 4

78

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

232

35%

LEVEL 2

195

29%

LEVEL 3

174

26%

LEVEL 4

66

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

95

22%

LEVEL 2

171

40%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

173

36%

LEVEL 2

193

40%

LEVEL 3

80

17%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

162

45%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

266
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 870

LEVEL 1

257

30%

LEVEL 2

347

40%

LEVEL 3

191

22%

LEVEL 4

75

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

232
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

215

34%

LEVEL 2

185

29%

LEVEL 3

169

27%

LEVEL 4

63

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 767

LEVEL 1

154

20%

LEVEL 2

343

45%

LEVEL 3

194

25%

LEVEL 4

76

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

155

27%

LEVEL 2

181

32%

LEVEL 3

169

30%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

114

82%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

77

80%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

146

22%

LEVEL 2

277

41%

LEVEL 3

178

27%

LEVEL 4

69

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

108

25%

LEVEL 2

135

31%

LEVEL 3

142

32%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

122

52%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

124

55%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.