ACADIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

472
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

74

10%

LEVEL 2

227

29%

LEVEL 3

276

36%

LEVEL 4

196

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

372
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

52

8%

LEVEL 2

203

32%

LEVEL 3

207

33%

LEVEL 4

165

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

251
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

137

36%

LEVEL 4

114

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

106

35%

LEVEL 4

94

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

221
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

139

36%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

101

31%

LEVEL 4

71

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

57
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

36

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

35

40%

LEVEL 4

31

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

388
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

59

9%

LEVEL 2

184

29%

LEVEL 3

236

37%

LEVEL 4

152

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

278
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

155

33%

LEVEL 3

152

32%

LEVEL 4

126

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

61%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

19

59%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

465
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 709

LEVEL 1

36

5%

LEVEL 2

208

29%

LEVEL 3

271

38%

LEVEL 4

194

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

187

32%

LEVEL 3

203

35%

LEVEL 4

164

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

38

59%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

28

57%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

372
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

201

32%

LEVEL 3

207

33%

LEVEL 4

165

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

437
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 689

LEVEL 1

56

8%

LEVEL 2

196

28%

LEVEL 3

253

37%

LEVEL 4

184

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

352
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

170

30%

LEVEL 3

191

34%

LEVEL 4

161

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

33

50%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.