Skip to Content
Main content

GOUVERNEUR CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

321

48%

LEVEL 2

228

34%

LEVEL 3

89

13%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

290

58%

LEVEL 2

152

30%

LEVEL 3

50

10%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

114

35%

LEVEL 2

130

40%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

114

49%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

207

60%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

176

66%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

314

48%

LEVEL 2

217

33%

LEVEL 3

84

13%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

282

58%

LEVEL 2

147

30%

LEVEL 3

49

10%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

80%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

208

39%

LEVEL 2

209

39%

LEVEL 3

88

16%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

196

49%

LEVEL 2

142

36%

LEVEL 3

50

13%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

113

85%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

94

90%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

127

38%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

83

45%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

194

57%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

29

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

207

65%

LEVEL 2

82

26%

LEVEL 3

23

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

123
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

310

47%

LEVEL 2

227

34%

LEVEL 3

89

13%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

60
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

284

58%

LEVEL 2

149

30%

LEVEL 3

50

10%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

11

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.