Skip to Content
Main content

CANTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

158

29%

LEVEL 2

188

35%

LEVEL 3

132

24%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

111

26%

LEVEL 2

148

34%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

64

23%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

94

35%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

65

30%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

149

28%

LEVEL 2

183

35%

LEVEL 3

128

24%

LEVEL 4

64

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

102

25%

LEVEL 2

143

35%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

87

19%

LEVEL 2

168

37%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

63

17%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

71

75%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

48

70%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

97

48%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

78

44%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

198
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

155

29%

LEVEL 2

186

35%

LEVEL 3

132

24%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.