BRASHER FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

224

47%

LEVEL 2

159

33%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

155

40%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

81

35%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

62

33%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

143

58%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

93

48%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

206

47%

LEVEL 2

143

33%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

134

39%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

181

42%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

118

35%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

43

90%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

37

82%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

68

33%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

156

58%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

115

53%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.