NYACK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

177

27%

LEVEL 2

257

39%

LEVEL 3

167

25%

LEVEL 4

54

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

184

40%

LEVEL 2

166

36%

LEVEL 3

86

19%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

130

42%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

89

41%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

113

33%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

113

47%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

27

47%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

25

48%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

126

40%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

68

48%

LEVEL 2

56

40%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

56

52%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

46

39%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

58

57%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

110

19%

LEVEL 2

245

43%

LEVEL 3

167

29%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

129

32%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

67

83%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

55

87%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

84

17%

LEVEL 2

201

41%

LEVEL 3

154

31%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

96

31%

LEVEL 2

121

39%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

93

56%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

88

59%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.