Skip to Content
Main content

BARDONIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

28

34%

LEVEL 4

15

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

31

42%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

38

42%

LEVEL 3

34

37%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

16

21%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

20

41%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

35

37%

LEVEL 3

36

38%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

59

38%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

49

38%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.