Skip to Content
Main content

SCHODACK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

110

27%

LEVEL 2

162

39%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

58

41%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

76

33%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

95

25%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

71

24%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

62

18%

LEVEL 2

145

42%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

113

43%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

48

72%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

32

63%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

98

41%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

38

46%

LEVEL 2

32

39%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

25

35%

LEVEL 2

29

41%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.