Skip to Content
Main content

ALGONQUIN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

163

23%

LEVEL 2

319

46%

LEVEL 3

128

18%

LEVEL 4

85

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

118

22%

LEVEL 2

200

37%

LEVEL 3

143

27%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

55

16%

LEVEL 2

162

48%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

157

44%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

80

28%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

205
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 661

LEVEL 1

149

23%

LEVEL 2

307

46%

LEVEL 3

124

19%

LEVEL 4

81

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

110

22%

LEVEL 2

189

37%

LEVEL 3

138

27%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

93

16%

LEVEL 2

282

48%

LEVEL 3

126

22%

LEVEL 4

83

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

183

39%

LEVEL 3

142

30%

LEVEL 4

73

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

70

63%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

50

74%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

190
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

108

19%

LEVEL 2

265

47%

LEVEL 3

112

20%

LEVEL 4

78

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

78

18%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

72

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

55

42%

LEVEL 2

54

41%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

40

42%

LEVEL 2

43

45%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.