Skip to Content
Main content

RENSSELAER PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

226

47%

LEVEL 2

138

29%

LEVEL 3

96

20%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

217

48%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

64

14%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

84

41%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

67

38%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

142

52%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

150

55%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

139

45%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

43

56%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

51

62%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

29

51%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

33

67%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

162

40%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

94

23%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

153

41%

LEVEL 2

143

39%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

64

90%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

64

83%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

176

54%

LEVEL 2

93

28%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

145

55%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.