Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSICK FALLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

112

33%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

92

34%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

57

45%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

100

32%

LEVEL 2

130

41%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

128

45%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

64

27%

LEVEL 2

105

44%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

40

77%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

28

85%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

57

42%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

60

38%

LEVEL 2

71

45%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

54

39%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.