Skip to Content
Main content

ONEONTA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

248

41%

LEVEL 2

200

33%

LEVEL 3

120

20%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

101

34%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

97

31%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

151

50%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

68

41%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

197

40%

LEVEL 2

167

34%

LEVEL 3

98

20%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

149

30%

LEVEL 2

191

38%

LEVEL 3

118

24%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

99

90%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

33

79%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

103

28%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

157

64%

LEVEL 2

65

26%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

64

52%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.