Skip to Content
Main content

HANNIBAL CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

292

47%

LEVEL 2

222

36%

LEVEL 3

90

14%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

315

52%

LEVEL 2

203

34%

LEVEL 3

69

11%

LEVEL 4

14

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

114

39%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

122

43%

LEVEL 2

116

41%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

178

54%

LEVEL 2

101

30%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

193

61%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

29

9%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

269

46%

LEVEL 2

212

36%

LEVEL 3

89

15%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

290

52%

LEVEL 2

191

34%

LEVEL 3

66

12%

LEVEL 4

14

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

216

40%

LEVEL 2

216

40%

LEVEL 3

90

17%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

240

46%

LEVEL 2

199

38%

LEVEL 3

69

13%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

76

93%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

75

95%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

61

30%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

68

37%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

231

55%

LEVEL 2

143

34%

LEVEL 3

36

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

247

59%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

28

7%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.