Skip to Content
Main content

FLORIDA UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

105

28%

LEVEL 2

163

44%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

104

35%

LEVEL 2

122

41%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

46

26%

LEVEL 2

74

42%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

59

30%

LEVEL 2

89

45%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

62

39%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

124

48%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

82

45%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

34

45%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

37

47%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

161

46%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

88

31%

LEVEL 2

120

43%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

17

89%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

16

89%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

94

33%

LEVEL 2

121

42%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

129

47%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

40

42%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

36

47%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

160

44%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

73
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

97

34%

LEVEL 2

117

41%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.