PORT JERVIS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,235

LEVEL 1

555

45%

LEVEL 2

456

37%

LEVEL 3

188

15%

LEVEL 4

36

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 950

LEVEL 1

459

48%

LEVEL 2

327

34%

LEVEL 3

141

15%

LEVEL 4

23

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

228

40%

LEVEL 2

228

40%

LEVEL 3

100

17%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

186

42%

LEVEL 2

162

37%

LEVEL 3

78

18%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 661

LEVEL 1

327

49%

LEVEL 2

228

34%

LEVEL 3

88

13%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

273

53%

LEVEL 2

165

32%

LEVEL 3

63

12%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

183
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 929

LEVEL 1

412

44%

LEVEL 2

334

36%

LEVEL 3

155

17%

LEVEL 4

28

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

327

46%

LEVEL 2

247

35%

LEVEL 3

114

16%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

63

55%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

48

58%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

63

43%

LEVEL 2

64

44%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

61

53%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 995

LEVEL 1

345

35%

LEVEL 2

429

43%

LEVEL 3

186

19%

LEVEL 4

35

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 752

LEVEL 1

287

38%

LEVEL 2

303

40%

LEVEL 3

139

18%

LEVEL 4

23

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

210

88%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

172

87%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

129

28%

LEVEL 2

203

43%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

93

30%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

426

55%

LEVEL 2

253

33%

LEVEL 3

79

10%

LEVEL 4

10

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

366

57%

LEVEL 2

209

33%

LEVEL 3

59

9%

LEVEL 4

8

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.