Skip to Content
Main content

PORT JERVIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

204

45%

LEVEL 2

156

35%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

157

50%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

88

41%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

75

47%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

116

49%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

82

52%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

152

43%

LEVEL 2

122

35%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

118

49%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

23

59%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

23

52%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

19

46%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

121

34%

LEVEL 2

147

41%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

92

37%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

83

88%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

65

94%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

75

43%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

32

31%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

154

56%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

125

59%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.