VALLEY CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 953

LEVEL 1

342

36%

LEVEL 2

389

41%

LEVEL 3

173

18%

LEVEL 4

49

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

200

35%

LEVEL 2

214

37%

LEVEL 3

114

20%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

135

29%

LEVEL 2

198

42%

LEVEL 3

104

22%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

88

32%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

207

43%

LEVEL 2

191

40%

LEVEL 3

69

14%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

112

37%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

207

33%

LEVEL 2

260

41%

LEVEL 3

121

19%

LEVEL 4

40

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

113

31%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

48

45%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

51

40%

LEVEL 2

56

44%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 769

LEVEL 1

199

26%

LEVEL 2

351

46%

LEVEL 3

170

22%

LEVEL 4

49

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

95

21%

LEVEL 2

197

44%

LEVEL 3

112

25%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

143

78%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

105

84%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

222
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 946

LEVEL 1

336

36%

LEVEL 2

388

41%

LEVEL 3

173

18%

LEVEL 4

49

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

162
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

198

35%

LEVEL 2

211

37%

LEVEL 3

114

20%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

143

25%

LEVEL 2

251

44%

LEVEL 3

132

23%

LEVEL 4

42

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

90

25%

LEVEL 2

146

41%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

199

52%

LEVEL 2

138

36%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

110

51%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.