OTISVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

114

34%

LEVEL 2

114

34%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

45

29%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

31

28%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

46

39%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

44

26%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

30

51%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

24

55%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

79

27%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

42

23%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

35

85%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

35

83%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

45

29%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

43

52%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

32

46%

LEVEL 2

29

41%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.