Skip to Content
Main content

PINE TREE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

163

25%

LEVEL 2

242

38%

LEVEL 3

173

27%

LEVEL 4

67

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

91

23%

LEVEL 2

157

40%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

105

32%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

85

41%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

102

33%

LEVEL 2

126

40%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

55

29%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

76

19%

LEVEL 2

153

39%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

21

38%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

54

41%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

30

33%

LEVEL 2

39

43%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

227

41%

LEVEL 3

169

30%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

146

41%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

68

76%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

31

74%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

109

20%

LEVEL 2

210

39%

LEVEL 3

152

28%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

132

40%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

54

50%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.