VICTOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

108

16%

LEVEL 2

243

36%

LEVEL 3

230

34%

LEVEL 4

98

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

88

22%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

185
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

125

39%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

68

29%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

311
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

93

15%

LEVEL 2

216

35%

LEVEL 3

218

35%

LEVEL 4

93

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

57

9%

LEVEL 2

223

37%

LEVEL 3

230

38%

LEVEL 4

97

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

51

71%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

31

76%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

302
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

205

36%

LEVEL 3

210

37%

LEVEL 4

92

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

47

42%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

31

54%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.