Skip to Content
Main content

TULLY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

123

29%

LEVEL 2

173

41%

LEVEL 3

106

25%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

71

35%

LEVEL 2

88

43%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

53

31%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

115

28%

LEVEL 2

165

41%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

72

20%

LEVEL 2

163

45%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

51

81%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

37

79%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

67

23%

LEVEL 2

123

41%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

85

38%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

56

44%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

49

45%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.