Skip to Content
Main content

LIVERPOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

64

22%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

65

28%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

60

38%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

51

42%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

54

40%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

40

37%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

81

35%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

102

41%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

88

45%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

28

64%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

29

81%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

74

37%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

34

35%

LEVEL 2

38

40%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

34

43%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.