Skip to Content
Main content

STONEHEDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

133

35%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

133

40%

LEVEL 2

124

38%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

79

39%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

75

44%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

119

35%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

116

39%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

101

30%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

100

34%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

32

76%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

33

89%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

79

34%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

50

55%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

54

57%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.