Skip to Content
Main content

ONONDAGA ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

41

41%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

22

25%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

28

31%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

81

44%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

65

42%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

23

79%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

19

83%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

66

41%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

53

41%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

27

53%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

26

54%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.