GENERAL HERKIMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

155

44%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

166

54%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

75

47%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

88

49%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

91

62%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

25

71%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

68

37%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

54

48%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

42

61%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

45

60%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

23

40%

LEVEL 2

27

47%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

30

53%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

105

36%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

109

44%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

50

88%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

57

97%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

130

49%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

36

92%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

44

32%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

111

52%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

154

59%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.