Skip to Content
Main content

VERNON-VERONA-SHERRILL MS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

66

24%

LEVEL 2

116

42%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

27

38%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

66

44%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

28

35%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

112

44%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

20

83%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

70

39%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

20

21%

LEVEL 2

36

37%

LEVEL 3

35

36%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

35

35%

LEVEL 2

46

46%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

24

44%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.