Skip to Content
Main content

CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

117

21%

LEVEL 2

222

40%

LEVEL 3

147

26%

LEVEL 4

73

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

85

19%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

131

30%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

7

58%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

204
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

110

21%

LEVEL 2

207

40%

LEVEL 3

136

26%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

82

20%

LEVEL 2

148

36%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

87

17%

LEVEL 2

206

40%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

30

65%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

34

74%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

198
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

82

19%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

131

30%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

98

19%

LEVEL 2

201

40%

LEVEL 3

140

28%

LEVEL 4

67

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

19

36%

LEVEL 2

21

40%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

18

43%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.