Skip to Content
Main content

BARKER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

120

33%

LEVEL 2

154

42%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

85

48%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

37

31%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

78

42%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

103

32%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

83

35%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

10

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

149

47%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

68

30%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

38

88%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

48

26%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

72

41%

LEVEL 2

79

45%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

57

42%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

89
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

118

33%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.