Skip to Content
Main content

PS 52 JOHN C THOMPSON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

112

43%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

106

43%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

39

35%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

66

47%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

62

46%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

87

43%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

82

44%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

92

49%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

85

48%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

45

63%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

39

55%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

103

44%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

86
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

95

43%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

62

50%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

19

20%

LEVEL 2

41

44%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

44

33%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

65

42%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.