PS 23 RICHMONDTOWN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

75

34%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

35

31%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

36

35%

LEVEL 4

27

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

9

25%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

74

43%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

58

41%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

40

56%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

116
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

32

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

54

41%

LEVEL 4

31

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

20

23%

LEVEL 2

35

41%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.