PS 90 HORACE MANN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

125

32%

LEVEL 2

145

37%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

106

29%

LEVEL 2

151

41%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

75

38%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

71

41%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

61
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

14

37%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

65

34%

LEVEL 2

85

44%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

93

29%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

126

44%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

43

61%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

45

59%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

116
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

89

26%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

105
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

142

44%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

36

72%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

31

72%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

115

33%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

140

42%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.