Skip to Content
Main content

PS 162 JOHN GOLDEN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

132

38%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

135

37%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

61

40%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

59

38%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

76

36%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

144
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

94

37%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

155
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

102

39%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

27

48%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

129

43%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

126

40%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

25

57%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

20

41%

LEVEL 2

19

39%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

181
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

129

40%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

186
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

130

38%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

14

58%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

64

45%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

29

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.