JAMES J AMBROSE SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

107

38%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

98

38%

LEVEL 4

82

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

36

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

52

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

57

42%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

55

43%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

124
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

78

41%

LEVEL 4

46

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

139
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

32

17%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

69

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

14

54%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

103

42%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

82

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

14

47%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

166
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

65

43%

LEVEL 4

43

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

56

39%

LEVEL 4

60

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.