JHS 189 DANIEL CARTER BEARD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 709

LEVEL 1

221

31%

LEVEL 2

290

41%

LEVEL 3

137

19%

LEVEL 4

61

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

204

32%

LEVEL 2

217

34%

LEVEL 3

151

24%

LEVEL 4

65

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

97

29%

LEVEL 2

144

43%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

84

27%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

124

33%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

120

37%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

152
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

143

29%

LEVEL 2

193

40%

LEVEL 3

100

20%

LEVEL 4

52

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

177
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

134

30%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

59

34%

LEVEL 2

81

47%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

58

37%

LEVEL 2

70

45%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

141

24%

LEVEL 2

249

43%

LEVEL 3

132

23%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

122

23%

LEVEL 2

189

36%

LEVEL 3

144

28%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

80

63%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

82

70%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

192
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

86

16%

LEVEL 2

249

47%

LEVEL 3

132

25%

LEVEL 4

60

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

212
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

79

16%

LEVEL 2

192

40%

LEVEL 3

147

30%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

135

74%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

125

81%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

75

32%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

129

32%

LEVEL 2

144

36%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.