Skip to Content
Main content

PS 143 LOUIS ARMSTRONG GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 857

LEVEL 1

437

51%

LEVEL 2

306

36%

LEVEL 3

89

10%

LEVEL 4

25

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 897

LEVEL 1

492

55%

LEVEL 2

306

34%

LEVEL 3

81

9%

LEVEL 4

18

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

189

47%

LEVEL 2

146

37%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

214

53%

LEVEL 2

139

35%

LEVEL 3

38

9%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

248

54%

LEVEL 2

160

35%

LEVEL 3

41

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

278

56%

LEVEL 2

167

34%

LEVEL 3

43

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

11

25%

LEVEL 2

21

48%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 802

LEVEL 1

422

53%

LEVEL 2

280

35%

LEVEL 3

81

10%

LEVEL 4

19

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 847

LEVEL 1

474

56%

LEVEL 2

286

34%

LEVEL 3

70

8%

LEVEL 4

17

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 733

LEVEL 1

338

46%

LEVEL 2

284

39%

LEVEL 3

86

12%

LEVEL 4

25

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

362

49%

LEVEL 2

278

38%

LEVEL 3

81

11%

LEVEL 4

18

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

99

80%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

130

82%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

109
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

210

37%

LEVEL 2

255

44%

LEVEL 3

86

15%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

247

42%

LEVEL 2

249

42%

LEVEL 3

75

13%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

227

80%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

3

1%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

245

79%

LEVEL 2

57

18%

LEVEL 3

6

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

29

62%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

30

70%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 810

LEVEL 1

408

50%

LEVEL 2

291

36%

LEVEL 3

86

11%

LEVEL 4

25

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 854

LEVEL 1

462

54%

LEVEL 2

296

35%

LEVEL 3

78

9%

LEVEL 4

18

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.