JHS 383 PHILIPPA SCHUYLER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

402
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 873

LEVEL 1

72

8%

LEVEL 2

399

46%

LEVEL 3

300

34%

LEVEL 4

102

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

422
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 872

LEVEL 1

114

13%

LEVEL 2

336

39%

LEVEL 3

304

35%

LEVEL 4

118

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

250
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

224

45%

LEVEL 3

184

37%

LEVEL 4

66

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

275
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

195

38%

LEVEL 3

200

39%

LEVEL 4

75

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

175

47%

LEVEL 3

116

31%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

28

46%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

25

51%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

201
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

214

47%

LEVEL 3

145

32%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

199
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

171

42%

LEVEL 3

143

35%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

152

46%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

176
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

148

37%

LEVEL 3

127

32%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 834

LEVEL 1

47

6%

LEVEL 2

389

47%

LEVEL 3

296

35%

LEVEL 4

102

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

415
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 817

LEVEL 1

76

9%

LEVEL 2

326

40%

LEVEL 3

298

36%

LEVEL 4

117

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

25

64%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

38

69%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

421
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 862

LEVEL 1

106

12%

LEVEL 2

335

39%

LEVEL 3

304

35%

LEVEL 4

117

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

80

38%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

305
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

56

8%

LEVEL 2

330

48%

LEVEL 3

234

34%

LEVEL 4

71

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

305
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

100

15%

LEVEL 2

255

39%

LEVEL 3

224

34%

LEVEL 4

81

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.