Skip to Content
Main content

PS 288 SHIRLEY TANYHILL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

112

50%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

136

52%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

55

48%

LEVEL 2

46

40%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

65

49%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

57

52%

LEVEL 2

42

38%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

71

55%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

59

49%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

58

44%

LEVEL 2

60

46%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

40

51%

LEVEL 2

33

42%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

65

64%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

58

37%

LEVEL 2

73

47%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

54

78%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

67

77%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

105

49%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

128

51%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

121

51%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.