Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 302 RAFAEL CORDERO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

287

55%

LEVEL 2

192

37%

LEVEL 3

32

6%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

121

50%

LEVEL 2

97

40%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

113

49%

LEVEL 2

98

42%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

49

45%

LEVEL 2

50

45%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

174

61%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

72

54%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

100

58%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

43

61%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

167

54%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

19

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

72

46%

LEVEL 2

68

43%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

197

49%

LEVEL 2

173

43%

LEVEL 3

30

7%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

78

40%

LEVEL 2

90

47%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

90

80%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

43

84%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

39
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

215

49%

LEVEL 2

187

42%

LEVEL 3

32

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

91

44%

LEVEL 2

92

44%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

72

94%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

30

86%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

46

58%

LEVEL 2

27

34%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

33

51%

LEVEL 2

24

37%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

241

55%

LEVEL 2

165

38%

LEVEL 3

29

7%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

88

49%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.