Skip to Content
Main content

PS 135 SHELDON A BROOKNER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

100

32%

LEVEL 2

130

42%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

100

33%

LEVEL 2

124

40%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

73

42%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

49

35%

LEVEL 2

59

42%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

50

37%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

88

31%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

92

33%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

10

67%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

75

27%

LEVEL 2

125

45%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

119

42%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

128

42%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

11

30%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

93

34%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

89

33%

LEVEL 2

109

40%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.