Skip to Content
Main content

PS 233 LANGSTON HUGHES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

105

41%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

47

37%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

33

28%

LEVEL 2

48

41%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

46

35%

LEVEL 2

60

46%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

39

39%

LEVEL 2

43

43%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

91

36%

LEVEL 2

104

41%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

71

33%

LEVEL 2

91

43%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

97

45%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

53

28%

LEVEL 2

82

44%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

33

73%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

19

61%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

87

38%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

65

34%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.