Skip to Content
Main content

MS 61 DR GLADSTONE H ATWELL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

255

36%

LEVEL 2

325

46%

LEVEL 3

110

15%

LEVEL 4

24

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 733

LEVEL 1

304

41%

LEVEL 2

291

40%

LEVEL 3

105

14%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

108

28%

LEVEL 2

174

46%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

110

31%

LEVEL 2

158

45%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

147

44%

LEVEL 2

151

45%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

194

51%

LEVEL 2

133

35%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

18

55%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

121
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

225

35%

LEVEL 2

290

46%

LEVEL 3

99

16%

LEVEL 4

22

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

115
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

246

40%

LEVEL 2

253

41%

LEVEL 3

92

15%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

28

44%

LEVEL 2

29

45%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

37

51%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

201

31%

LEVEL 2

307

48%

LEVEL 3

109

17%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

238

36%

LEVEL 2

277

42%

LEVEL 3

105

16%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

54

74%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

66

83%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

134
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 686

LEVEL 1

231

34%

LEVEL 2

321

47%

LEVEL 3

110

16%

LEVEL 4

24

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

137
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

280

40%

LEVEL 2

284

41%

LEVEL 3

104

15%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

24

86%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

24

75%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

107

43%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

197

41%

LEVEL 2

205

42%

LEVEL 3

61

13%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.