Skip to Content
Main content

PS 38 PACIFIC GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

40

45%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

39

41%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

30

40%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

18

24%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

39

44%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

25

38%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

29

35%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

25

43%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

58

45%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

32

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

35

80%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

50
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

45

30%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

53

32%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

48

41%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

49

38%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.