Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX SCHOOL FOR LAW, GOV, JUSTICE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

131

52%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

122

47%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

69

51%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

77

52%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

62

53%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

36

51%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

34

55%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

91

53%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

82

44%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

116

52%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

111

49%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

22

59%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

122

52%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

115

48%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

13

62%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

10

77%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

121

51%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

118

47%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.