Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 144 MICHELANGELO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

317

48%

LEVEL 2

278

42%

LEVEL 3

60

9%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

239

47%

LEVEL 2

203

40%

LEVEL 3

60

12%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

139

44%

LEVEL 2

141

44%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

106

43%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

178

52%

LEVEL 2

137

40%

LEVEL 3

25

7%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

133

50%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

204

45%

LEVEL 2

208

46%

LEVEL 3

40

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

157

45%

LEVEL 2

147

42%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

94

57%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

68

49%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

209

40%

LEVEL 2

255

48%

LEVEL 3

57

11%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

146

37%

LEVEL 2

182

46%

LEVEL 3

57

14%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

108

81%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

93

79%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

282

46%

LEVEL 2

269

44%

LEVEL 3

60

10%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

218

45%

LEVEL 2

196

40%

LEVEL 3

60

12%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

35

80%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

21

75%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

81

45%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

158

48%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.