Skip to Content
Main content

PS 205 FIORELLO LAGUARDIA GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

171

38%

LEVEL 2

208

46%

LEVEL 3

69

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

178

36%

LEVEL 2

207

42%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

68

32%

LEVEL 2

102

47%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

81

32%

LEVEL 2

117

46%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

103

43%

LEVEL 2

106

44%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

97

42%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

26

38%

LEVEL 2

36

52%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

27

34%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

137

38%

LEVEL 2

160

44%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

140

37%

LEVEL 2

167

44%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

177

48%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

119

30%

LEVEL 2

180

46%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

57

63%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

59

61%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

126

32%

LEVEL 2

189

48%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

129

31%

LEVEL 2

185

44%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

45

68%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

49

67%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

49

45%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

143

38%

LEVEL 2

158

42%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.