Skip to Content
Main content

PS 9 RYER AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

206

57%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

207

56%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

95

55%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

86

49%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

111

59%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

121

62%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

32

56%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

39

67%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

171

58%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

162

54%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

146

52%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

140

50%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

60

76%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

67

76%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

126

48%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

40
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

140

50%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

80

82%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

67

74%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

189

57%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.