Skip to Content
Main content

HARRIET TUBMAN CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

146

34%

LEVEL 2

186

44%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

124

30%

LEVEL 2

186

45%

LEVEL 3

89

22%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

113

47%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

115

49%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

97

32%

LEVEL 2

129

43%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

92

32%

LEVEL 2

123

42%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

46

38%

LEVEL 2

55

45%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

31

27%

LEVEL 2

60

52%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

106

29%

LEVEL 2

162

45%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

167

46%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

40

63%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

30

59%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

127

32%

LEVEL 2

181

45%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

105

27%

LEVEL 2

179

46%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

19

76%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

19

73%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

67

46%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

106

36%

LEVEL 2

133

45%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

86

32%

LEVEL 2

119

45%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.